Now having 7,000 + listed!

Probably becoming the most extensive British flying sites guide online...?

portfolio1 portfolio2 portfolio3 portfolio4

Heading 1

This is an example of the content for a specific image in the Nivo slider. Provide a short description of the image here....

Heading 2

This is an example of the content for a specific image in the Nivo slider. Provide a short description of the image here....

Heading 3

This is an example of the content for a specific image in the Nivo slider. Provide a short description of the image here....

Heading 4

This is an example of the content for a specific image in the Nivo slider. Provide a short description of the image here....

small portfolio1 small portfolio2 small portfolio3 small portfolio4
themed object
A Guide to the history of British flying sites within the United Kingdom
get in touch

Colleyweston



*COLLYWESTON: Military Aerodrome

Military user: WW2:   RAF Fighter Command 12 Group

 

*Battle of Britain RAF Station (10th July 1940)

23 Sqdn   (Bristol Blenheims*)     [1st August 1940 still based here]

Gunnery Research Unit
 

Location: 3nm SSW of Stamford, just W and adjacent to RAF WITTERING

Period of operation: 1940 to ? (still operational in 1985 according to one source)
 

Runways: N/S   1371   grass        NE/SW   1335   grass           E/W   914   grass 
               SE/NW   1152   grass



NOTES:
This aerodrome does appear unique, in that it overlapped the site of RAF WITTERING as it was later developed.


THE BLENHEIM AS A FIGHTER
* The use of the Bristol Blenheim in a fighter role by RAF Fighter Command came as a considerable surprise to me. I suppose it shouldn’t have been so much of a surprise considering the Luftwaffe were using Me.110s?

In fact, when the ‘Battle of Britain’ started in July 1940 RAF Fighter Command had Blenheims also on hand at CATTERICK (YORKSHIRE), DIGBY (LINCOLNSHIRE), MANSTON (KENT), MARTLESHAM (SUFFOLK), NORTHOLT (LONDON). The poor sods flying them were mostly slaughtered. To all intents and purposes flying on suicide missions? Or am I mistaken?

Indeed, I discovered that in 1940 one Blenheim ‘Squadron’ at TANGMERE was listed as a FIU, (Fighter Interception Unit).

Exactly who I wonder, what utter crackpot, decided that A): The Blenheim could perform such duties? And B): How on earth could such a type be expected to perform from a ‘Forward Airfield’ where even the best single-seat RAF fighters couldn’t be operated to any advantage? By and large even the 'first-line' fighters were placed far too near to the incoming forces to gain a strategic advantage.



A COMPARISON 
Perhaps a basic comparison of these two types might be of interest? Although a highly questionable and simplistic approach I do think some truths emerge.

Bristol Blenheim Mk.IV            Max speed:  266mph      Range: 2351km       Ceiling: 27,260ft

Messerschmidt Bf.110 C-4       Max speed:   348mph     Range: 2410km       Ceiling: 35,000ft

So, obviously the Blenheim could not be expected to attack a single-seat fighter, but what chance based on these figures, would it have had against its closest Luftwaffe foe?



SUICIDE MISSIONS
There is a huge amount of hypocrisy involved here. Ever since WW2 and even today we tend to think very poorly about the Japanese ‘kamikazi’ pilots. In fact they did not freely volunteer as such, they were heavily manipulated and coerced to undertake such duties. I think a direct comparison can be made for many missions undertaken by the RAF during WW2. It’s an interesting and fine-line distinction between going out intending to die on a mission taking-off knowing you’ll almost certainly die on a given mission?


OFTEN OVERLOOKED
Invariably the history of the RAF bombing campaign tends to focus on the heavy bombers. And indeed, they had a very tough time of it. But, nowhere near as tough a time as the medium bombers, who the RAF yop brass decided were invariably to be sent on low-level and clearly usually suicidal missions. Not just my opinion - the facts are there for all to see.
 


PERHAPS SOMETHING TO CONSIDER?
It occurs to me that most of the RAF top brass served in WW1, which of course had only ended twenty years before. So the principal of throwing troops “over the top” and it being mostly a numbers game was still probably much in evidence? I will certainly argue that ‘Butcher’ Harris as he was known by his aircrews in Bomber Command certainly took this approach? There is almost no evidence of any intelligent approach regarding tactics being made under his command.

And, we must not credit Harris with being the instigator for the radio navigation aids which later emerged. Or should we?

Which pehaps contrasts sharply with the methods used by Fighter Command under Dowding, using radar interception techniques and a fully integrated communications network.

With all this said I have a grudging admiration for 'Bomber' Harris. The poor man had so much to deal with, and, despite this came up with truly inspirational ideas - such as the thousand bomber raids. Without any doubt, when this offensive emerged, the Nazi regime shoud have realised the war was won. And many did of course - but the 'ball was rolling' and, as it turmed out, unstoppable.
 

 

 

We'd love to hear from you, so please scroll down to leave a comment!

 


 

Leave a comment ...


Name
 
Email:
 
Message:
 

 
Copyright (c) UK Airfield Guide

                                                

slide up button